Key Takeaways
✅ Nucor’s January 20 price increase of $10/ton to $960/ton for hot rolled coil reflects surging raw material costs, including prime scrap up $20/gt and coking coal at 18-month highs due to Australian floods.
✅ Raw materials account for 56-71% of steel production costs; with prime scrap and coking coal reaching elevated levels, Nucor and competitors have strong economic justification for maintaining higher steel pricing through Q1 2026.
✅ Despite supply-side strength from tariff protections and mill coordination, demand remains uneven outside data center construction, creating pricing risk mid-to-late Q1 if broader orders fail to materialize.
Introduction
On January 20, 2026, Nucor Corporation, North America’s largest steel producer, announced an increase in its hot rolled coil (HRC) consumer spot price, raising the base price to $960 per short ton for all producing mills except its California Steel Industries (CSI) joint venture location, where the price reached $1,010 per ton. This $10-per-ton increase breaks a four-week streak of price stability and signals renewed confidence in steel market conditions despite persistent demand uncertainties. The move comes amid a dramatic shift in raw material input costs, where ferrous scrap prices have climbed to their highest levels since August, coking coal has reached 18-month highs, and iron ore has settled near multi-year peaks. Understanding the drivers behind this Nucor steel price increase requires examining the intersection of supply-side constraints, geopolitical disruptions, raw material inflation, and the complex demand dynamics shaping the 2026 steel market landscape.
Understanding Nucor’s Steel Price Structure and Market Role
Who Is Nucor and Why Does Their Pricing Matter?
Nucor Corporation represents the institutional backbone of North American steel production, commanding approximately 25-30% of domestic capacity through its network of electric arc furnace (EAF) mills strategically positioned across the United States. Unlike integrated steelmakers that rely on iron ore and coking coal through blast furnace technology, Nucor operates exclusively through EAF mills that melt recycled scrap steel into new products. This operational distinction proves critical to understanding both the company’s cost structure and its pricing philosophy. Nucor’s choice to focus entirely on scrap-based production has positioned it as North America’s largest recycler and has insulated the company from some commodity price volatility while making it particularly sensitive to scrap metal pricing dynamics.
The company’s hot rolled coil (HRC) pricing carries outsized significance because it serves as the market-wide benchmark that influences pricing decisions across the industry. When Nucor announces price changes, competing mills including U.S. Steel, Cleveland-Cliffs, and regional producers typically follow within days or weeks, creating a cascading effect through the supply chain. The CSP (Consumer Spot Price) designation indicates that these prices apply to Nucor’s spot market customers rather than long-term contract holders, and the fact that Nucor announced different pricing for CSI reflects the unique market dynamics of West Coast steel supply, where CSI’s geographic isolation from other major mills commands a premium pricing opportunity.
The Raw Materials Crisis: Why Steel Prices Are Rising in January 2026
Prime Scrap Surge: The Foundation of EAF Economics
The single most important input cost for Nucor and other EAF steelmakers is ferrous scrap metal, which accounts for up to 72% of operating costs in scrap-based production. In January 2026, prime scrap (also called “#1 busheling”) prices surged to $415 per gross ton, representing a $20-per-ton monthly increase from December’s $395/gt level. This 5.1% month-over-month jump marks the highest busheling price since August 2025 and reflects the most significant margin expansion opportunity for EAF mills in months.
The price increase stems from multiple concurrent supply-side factors that have tightened scrap availability entering the new year. First, numerous mills deliberately drew down scrap inventories during December for year-end accounting purposes, creating a natural inventory restocking cycle in January. Several major mills entered January with materially reduced scrap reserves and accelerated their buying programs, lifting overall scrap demand above historical seasonal norms. Second, winter weather conditions have begun affecting scrap collection and logistics, with reduced availability from demolished construction materials and weather-disrupted transportation networks. Third, shredded scrap prices increased by $30/gt in January to $415/gt, reaching parity with prime scrap pricing for the first time since December 2022. This unusual convergence in pricing between the two major scrap grades signals strong overall scrap demand and limited grade availability across the market.
The tight scrap market conditions have translated into improved mill margins. With HRC spot prices holding above $920-$930 per short ton throughout January and scrap costs climbing, the absolute spread between output prices and primary input costs has expanded favorably for EAF operators. When converting scrap to steel equivalents, the differential between HRC and busheling scrap widened to approximately $558 per short ton as of mid-January, up $20/st from the prior month. Though this spread remains within historical ranges, the marginal improvement provides economic justification for Nucor and competitors to maintain disciplined pricing postures and avoid the discount cutting that characterized parts of 2024 and 2025.
Coking Coal Shock: Australian Supply Disruptions Cascade Through Markets
While Nucor’s EAF mills do not directly consume coking coal, movements in coking coal pricing carry significant indirect importance. When coking coal prices rise sharply, it increases production costs for integrated mills using blast furnace technology, which in turn influences their willingness to discount HRC and flat-rolled products to maintain market share. Conversely, when coal prices spike beyond economic viability, some integrated producers curtail output, reducing overall supply and supporting prices for EAF-based competitors like Nucor.
In January 2026, coking coal reached $228 per metric ton, marking the highest price since July 2024 and the 18-month peak for this critical steelmaking input. The price spike resulted from extraordinary supply disruptions originating in northeastern Australia, the world’s dominant metallurgical coal exporter supplying roughly 50% of seaborne traded volumes. Tropical Cyclone Koji unleashed weeks of heavy rainfall across Queensland’s Bowen Basin mining region, causing unprecedented flooding that forced multiple major coal producers to declare “force majeure” – legal exemptions from contractual obligations due to acts beyond their control.
By mid-January 2026, Stanmore Resources, Pembroke Resources, and Fitzroy Coal Sales had all formally notified customers of delivery delays and inability to fulfill contracted tonnages. The logistical breakdown extended beyond mine operations. Railway lines connecting interior coal mines to Dalrymple Bay Coal Terminal became saturated or damaged, and roads in key transportation corridors turned impassable. At port facilities, more than 40 vessels accumulated in queue waiting to load coal that could not reach the dock. The Goonyella rail line serving multiple Bowen Basin mines faced particular constraints, with road saturation and water damage limiting coal transport volumes to a fraction of normal rates. Analysts project that supply restoration will require 4-8 weeks, implying that elevated coking coal prices will persist through February and potentially into March 2026.
For EAF steelmakers, the Australian floods represent favorable supply-side economics. As integrated mills face higher coal costs, some will reduce blast furnace operating rates or curtail production, reducing direct supply competition for flat-rolled products. Industry sources have noted that several integrated producers have already telegraphed maintenance outages stretching from February through March, which will further tighten overall HRC supply during the critical first quarter. Though the production cuts primarily affect integrated mills rather than EAF facilities, they generate favorable competitive conditions for Nucor by reducing rival supply capacity.
Iron Ore Stability Amid Chinese Demand Shifts
Unlike coking coal, which has experienced acute supply disruptions, iron ore pricing has remained relatively stable despite climbing to the highest level since July 2024. As of January 20, 2026, spot iron ore settled at approximately $107.70 per metric ton, off modestly from prior-week levels of $107.85/mt but maintaining a strong position within its recent range. The resilience in iron ore pricing despite flat to slightly negative weekly movements reflects competing demand signals from Chinese steel producers who are simultaneously restocking depleted inventories while concerns about demand persistence create hesitation around major new commitments.
Chinese steelmakers have been actively purchasing iron ore to rebuild inventories that had declined during the December demand slowdown. Blast furnace operations have begun ramping up as mills respond to improved pricing environments and confidence that flat-rolled demand will remain steady through the first quarter. However, a mining accident at Inner Mongolia Baotou Steel Union’s plate factory in mid-January – which killed six workers and injured 84 – briefly spooked iron ore buyers who feared government safety inspections would trigger output curtailments. This incident illustrates the fragility of demand-side assumptions and the potential for negative surprises to reverse pricing momentum.
The iron ore market also reflects ongoing tensions in China’s state purchasing negotiations. BHP Group, the world’s largest publicly traded miner, disclosed that it has accepted reduced prices for certain iron ore grades during discussions with China Mineral Resources Group, the state-owned buyer coordinating domestic purchases. The price concessions signal BHP’s willingness to sacrifice near-term pricing to secure volume in a market where supply continues to exceed demand outside China. For Nucor and other U.S.-based producers, stable iron ore pricing supports integrated producers’ ability to maintain production, which in turn maintains competitive pricing pressure on EAF products. However, as long as iron ore remains accessible at reasonable prices, integrated mills retain the economic incentive to operate blast furnaces rather than curtail, limiting the supply-side benefits that Nucor would otherwise capture.
Nucor’s Strategic Response: Timing, Pricing Power, and Competitive Positioning
The January 20 Decision: Why Now?
Nucor’s decision to raise prices by $10/ton on January 20, 2026, represents a carefully calibrated response to shifting supply-demand balances. The company had maintained flat pricing at $950/ton for four consecutive weeks (ending January 10, January 3, December 27, and December 20), signaling both market cautiousness and internal cost stability. The pivot to increase prices effective immediately for the January 20 week suggests that internal analysis detected a meaningful shift in either input costs or demand momentum justifying the higher price.
Several factors appear to have influenced the timing. First, the raw material surge created favorable opportunity: scrap at $415/gt and coal at $228/mt represented meaningfully elevated costs that justified passing through to customers. Second, winter weather constraints on scrap availability were becoming visible in market discussions, and mills wanted to lock in price discipline before the market tightened further. Third, Nucor’s lead-time announcements had consistently referenced 3-5 weeks of delivery delays, suggesting that order books had rebuilt to comfortable levels and that the company possessed pricing power to sustain higher quotes without demand destruction. Fourth, competitor announcements signaled emerging price discipline: SSAB and Oregon Steel had both announced plate price increases in January, and market commentary indicated that mills across regions were coordinating upward pricing postures.
Market-Wide Demand: Uneven Across Segments, Constrained by Uncertainty
Data Centers: The Bright Spot Amid Industrial Softness
The single most robustly performing demand segment for flat-rolled steel in 2026 has been data center construction, which has emerged as a surprising bright spot in an otherwise soft industrial economy. Data center construction spending reached a seasonally-adjusted annualized rate of $41.4 billion in August 2025, representing a 26% year-over-year increase and marking the fastest-growing major construction category. This surge reflects the artificial intelligence computing boom, where major technology companies (Microsoft, Google, Amazon, Meta) have committed unprecedented capital to expanding data center capacity to meet training and inference workload demands.
For steelmakers like Nucor, the data center boom creates multiple revenue streams beyond the structural steel used in building frames. Data centers require extensive electrical infrastructure, mechanical systems, transformers, cable trays, and interconnect materials – many produced from hot rolled and cold rolled flat products. The sector’s continued strength provides a demand floor that prevents HRC prices from collapsing even if other end-use markets weaken. However, industry observers caution that growth rates for data center construction have begun moderating. The 26% YoY growth rate recorded in August 2025 has decelerated from the 63% annualized rate observed 12 months prior, suggesting that the sector is normalizing from explosive growth toward more sustainable expansion rates.
Automotive Production: EV Transition and Volume Uncertainty
Automotive steel demand represents approximately 35% of flat-rolled steel consumption and historically serves as a critical demand anchor. However, 2025 and early 2026 have witnessed unusual complexity as domestic automakers execute major strategy shifts toward electric vehicle production while managing inventory levels, manufacturing footprint optimization, and tariff-related cost pressures. U.S. automotive production volumes are expected to remain essentially flat year-over-year in 2026, with most analysts projecting variations of plus-or-minus 1% rather than meaningful growth.
The vehicle production plateau masks important compositional changes. EV transition is driving increased demand for advanced high-strength steel (AHSS) and ultra-high-strength steel (UHSS) products that enable weight reduction and improved performance characteristics. These specialty grades command premium pricing relative to conventional automotive steel, supporting profitability for producers who have invested in capability to produce them. However, total automotive steel tonnage is not growing as rapidly as electric vehicle unit volumes suggest because EV platforms use less steel per vehicle than traditional internal combustion engines. The net effect creates stable volume but margin-favorable mix shifts toward higher-value products.
Construction Outside Data Centers: Residential and Commercial Weakness
Non-residential construction spending (excluding data center-specific categories) declined 1.5% year-over-year as of August 2025 on a seasonally-adjusted basis, signaling weakness in traditional flat-rolled consuming segments. Residential construction has remained resilient by historical standards but has not generated the explosive growth that would meaningfully increase overall steel demand. Commercial office construction continues to suffer from structural oversupply and remote work trends that reduce square footage requirements per employee.
The construction weakness has cascading impacts through the steel supply chain. Service centers typically rebuild inventory when demand accelerates, but stagnant or declining construction demand has made service centers conservative about forward purchasing. This caution dampens downstream mill demand even when spot prices appear attractive, creating a demand destruction dynamic that limits mills’ pricing leverage despite tight supply conditions. For Nucor, this dynamic creates a critical risk: supply-side tightness from tariffs and mill outages can support prices in the near term, but if broad-based demand fails to materialize in March and April 2026, inventory correction among service centers could trigger rapid price depreciation.
Agricultural Demand: Tariffs and Trade Uncertainty Weigh on Farm Equipment
Farm equipment demand represents a niche but important segment of flat-rolled demand, with several million tons annually flowing to agricultural machinery manufacturers. However, 2025 and early 2026 have witnessed significant demand deterioration in this sector. Heavy tariffs on imported inputs and Chinese agricultural commodity restrictions have pressured farm profitability, leading major equipment manufacturers like John Deere to announce layoffs and production cutbacks. John Deere specifically cited tariff-driven cost increases and reduced farmer profitability as reasons for reductions at Iowa manufacturing facilities.
The farm sector weakness reflects broader supply chain anxieties created by the Trump administration’s aggressive tariff posture. Farmers have become hesitant to invest in new equipment when tariff policy uncertainty creates the possibility of further cost increases. Equipment manufacturers have reduced procurement commitments, dampening flat-rolled demand. While the agricultural sector represents only 4-6% of overall flat-rolled consumption, its weakness serves as a leading indicator of broader industrial demand deterioration if trade policy uncertainty persists or tariffs escalate further.
The Tariff Dimension: Supply Constraints Supporting Price Discipline
Section 232 Protection Architecture
Nucor’s pricing power in January 2026 rests partly on the protective tariff architecture that the Trump administration has implemented on steel imports. The original Section 232 tariffs, initially imposed in March 2018, established a 25% duty on all steel imports and 10% on aluminum imports. These tariffs were modified during 2025, with the administration escalating rates to 50% in June 2025 and extending the tariff scope to include finished products and derivative articles beginning in August 2025. The effect of this tariff escalation has been to dramatically increase the landed cost of imported steel, rendering foreign supply uncompetitive for most applications even when international prices are significantly lower than U.S. domestic pricing.
Foreign steelmakers cannot profitably sell into the U.S. market at a $200-$250/ton discount to domestic pricing when forced to absorb a 50% tariff on an already-lower international price. The math becomes prohibitive: if Asian HRC is priced at $500/ton and U.S. domestic pricing reaches $950/ton, the tariff add of $250/ton (50% of $500) means Asian sellers face a landed cost equivalent of $750/ton before adding freight, insurance, tariffs, and margins. The tariff protection has essentially eliminated import competition, allowing domestic mills to maintain discipline on pricing without fear that buyers will abandon spot purchases for import orders.
Import Constraints and Lead-Time Extension Effects
With imports economically constrained, buyers cannot easily pivot to alternative sources even when domestic prices climb. This inelasticity of demand – driven by tariff-inflated import prices – allows mills to extend lead times and maintain pricing discipline. Nucor’s advertised 3-5 week lead times are considerably longer than the 1-3 week norm of the mid-2010s, but buyers accept the extension because they cannot substitute with imports or alternative domestic supply. The lead-time extension also serves a tactical function: it allows mills to limit order velocity to match production capacity, preventing inventory buildup that would force price concessions.
For the week of January 20, 2026, transactions in the spot HRC market totaled only 2,528 short tons across 11 transactions according to market reports, representing one of the lowest transaction volumes on record. This anemic spot market activity, combined with extended lead times, reveals that most buyers have shifted to contract purchasing or forward commitments that lock prices in advance. The spot market’s diminished role reflects both tariff-driven import constraints (which eliminate spot import alternatives) and buyer recognition that forward commitments provide pricing certainty and lead-time visibility superior to spot purchasing.
Capacity Utilization and Supply Discipline: Structural Underpinnings
Current Utilization Rates Signal Operational Discipline
U.S. steel mills operated at approximately 75.3% capacity utilization for the year-to-date period ending January 10, 2026, modestly above the 74.4% rate from the same week in 2025 but well below the historical long-term average of 79.05%. The 75% utilization rate, while respectable, indicates that mills retain meaningful spare capacity and have not yet reached constraint levels that would automatically drive prices higher through supply scarcity. However, the utilization rate also signals that mills are operating with discipline rather than maximizing output at any price, a strategic choice that supports pricing discipline.
When utilization rates reach 85-90%, mills typically reduce lead times and accept marginal price concessions to run at full throughput because fixed cost absorption drives profitability calculations. At 75% utilization, by contrast, mills can afford to maintain longer lead times and pricing discipline because they have sufficient unused capacity to absorb demand fluctuations without straining operations. Nucor’s decision to maintain 3-5 week lead times despite 75% utilization reflects this calculation: the company is purposefully managing demand to support pricing rather than attempting to run flat-out production.
Forward Outlook: Competing Scenarios for Q1 and Q2 2026
Base Case: Prices Remain Elevated Through February
The most likely scenario for the remainder of Q1 2026 envisions prices remaining at or modestly above current levels through February, with gradual softening in March and April as demand seasonality and inventory replenishment cycles mature. In this scenario, coking coal prices remain elevated through February as Australian supply restoration unfolds gradually, supporting continued cost justification for higher HRC pricing. Scrap prices maintain the $410-$425/gt range as mills complete their January restocking and buying patterns normalize. Data center construction orders provide a sufficient demand floor to prevent inventory accumulation and forced price cutting.
In this base case, Nucor maintains the $960/ton base with potential for another $5-$10/ton increase if coking coal prices climb further (to $240+/mt) or if broad-based ordering accelerates. The company likely holds the $1,010/ton CSI pricing through mid-Q1 before considering any adjustments. Lead times compress modestly from 4-5 weeks to 3-4 weeks as demand patterns clarify, but remain elevated relative to historical norms, preserving pricing discipline. By late March, if demand growth has not materialized, the company might announce price stability (“prices unchanged”) rather than increases, signaling market caution while avoiding explicit price cuts.
Upside Scenario: Demand Acceleration Extends Price Strength
An upside scenario would develop if automotive production volumes begin accelerating earlier than expected (driven by tariff-induced inventory building or supply chain normalization), or if energy sector demand for power infrastructure supporting data center expansion exceeds current expectations. In this scenario, orders would accumulate faster than mills can produce, lead times would extend to 6-8 weeks, and mills would achieve pricing discipline extending well beyond February.
In this case, Nucor could announce price increases of $15-$25/ton per month through March, with broader industry participation creating synchronized pricing discipline across producers. Supply tightness would be genuine and demand-driven rather than artificially constrained through lead-time manipulation. Capital allocation discussions would shift toward mill expansions and capacity investments. However, this upside scenario requires demand acceleration that has not yet materialized in January market discussions, and most industry participants express skepticism about near-term demand strength.
Downside Scenario: Demand Deterioration Forces Price Correction
A downside scenario develops if broad-based ordering fails to materialize beyond data center construction and tariff-driven purchasing acceleration ebbs. This could occur if automotive production volumes decline, construction activity deteriorates further, or consumer sentiment declines sharply. In this case, service centers would recognize inventory overstocking by mid-February and reduce forward purchasing sharply. Mills would face accumulating inventory and order flow collapse, forcing price concessions despite continued tight supply conditions on a spot basis.
In the downside scenario, Nucor would announce price reductions of $10-$20/ton in mid-to-late March, potentially falling back below $950/ton by April. Competitors would follow quickly, triggering the rapid price depreciation that historically has characterized transition periods between supply-tight and demand-weak market regimes. This downside risk appears material if demand growth outside data centers fails to materialize and if farmer/agricultural equipment demand continues deteriorating due to tariff uncertainty.
Conclusion: Nucor’s Price Increase as Market Signal
Nucor’s January 20 announcement raising HRC pricing to $960/ton represents a carefully calibrated response to favorable near-term supply conditions, elevated input costs, and demonstrated market willingness to accept price increases. The decision reflects management confidence that raw material inflation and winter weather constraints on scrap supply justify higher pricing, and that competitor discipline will prevent aggressive spot competition from undermining list prices.
However, the price increase should not be interpreted as a signal that steel pricing has sustainably shifted to a new, permanently higher equilibrium. Rather, it reflects a favorable but potentially transient confluence of supply-side factors including Australian coal disruptions, scrap inventory cycles, and tariff-protected demand. The persistence of this pricing strength depends critically on whether broad-based demand growth materializes beyond the data center sector. If non-data-center demand remains soft through February and March, inventory correction could force substantial price declines by mid-Q1, unwinding the entire January-February price increase.
For buyers and supply chain managers, Nucor’s price increase serves as a signal to accelerate forward purchasing if forward pricing remains favorable relative to spot, and to carefully manage inventory accumulation to avoid paying premium prices for material that cannot be deployed into weak end-use demand. For investors and market observers, the price increase represents a tactical opportunity to capture favorable spreads during the supply-tight window, but requires clear-eyed recognition that this window likely closes by late March if demand growth does not accelerate. The January 2026 steel market remains characterized by unusual tension between genuine supply constraints (coal, tariffs, lead times) and persistent demand uncertainty (automotive flat, agriculture weak, construction soft). Nucor’s pricing decision favors the supply-side factors, but the sustainability of higher prices rests ultimately on whether demand-side fundamentals can support the price floor that current raw material costs justify.
SOURCES
Nucor Corporation Price Announcement, January 20, 2026
https://www.argusmedia.com/en/news-and-insights/latest-market-news/2765935-nucor-raises-us-hrc-price-for-8th-week
Argus Media – US HRC Market Reports (January 2026)
https://www.argusmedia.com/en/news-and-insights/latest-market-news/2771030-viewpoint-us-flat-steel-demand-hinges-on-data-centers
Steel Market Update – Ferrous Scrap and HRC Pricing Analysis
https://www.steelmarketupdate.com/2026/01/13/us-ferrous-scrap-prices-rise-across-board-in-january/
Trading Economics – HRC Steel Price Index and Historical Data
https://tradingeconomics.com/commodity/hrc-steel
American Iron and Steel Institute (AISI) – Weekly Steel Production Reports
https://www.steelorbis.com/steel-news/latest-news/us-raw-steel-production-is-up-28-percent-week-1-2026-1429283.htm
S&P Global Energy – Coking Coal Market Analysis and Australian Disruptions
https://www.spglobal.com/energy/en/news-research/latest-news/metals/011326-australias-fitzroy-declares-force-majeure-on-coking-c
Bloomberg – Iron Ore Market Analysis and Chinese Demand Dynamics
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-01-15/iron-ore-s-strength-hard-to-reconcile-with-soft-chinese-demand
Fastmarkets – US Steel Capacity Utilization and Production Data
https://ycharts.com/indicators/us_capacity_utilization_iron_and_steel_products_monthly
California Steel Industries – Joint Venture History and Operations
https://www.californiasteel.com/history
Miller Johnson Law – Trump Tariff Analysis and Implementation
https://millerjohnson.com/publication/trump-raises-25-tariff-on-all-aluminum-and-steel-imports/
Trade Compliance Resource Hub – Section 232 Tariff Timeline
https://www.tradecomplianceresourcehub.com/2026/01/18/trump-2-0-tariff-tracker/
US Census Bureau – Construction Spending and Capacity Utilization Data
https://ycharts.com/indicators/us_capacity_utilization_iron_and_steel_products_monthly
World Steel Association – Global Supply and Demand Forecasts
https://www.steelonthenet.com/advisory/trends/economics.html
Nucor Newsroom – Electric Arc Furnace Technology and Sustainability
http://nucor.com/newsroom/circularity-in-steel-part-1-the-history-of-electric-arc-furnace-eaf
Metal Center News – Carbon Flat-Rolled Steel Market Outlook
https://www.metalcenternews.com/editorial/current-issue/carbon-flat-rolled/45987
Disclaimer
The content provided in this article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, or professional advice. Readers should seek consultation with qualified professionals before making any financial, investment, or legal decisions. We disclaim any liability for losses, damages, or adverse outcomes resulting from decisions made based on the information presented herein.
Check out our most recent articles below:
- Understanding 2025 Global Trade: Trade Imbalance, Dollar Devaluation, and Tariffs
- Nucor Raises HRC Steel Price to $960/Ton: Raw Materials, Market Dynamics, and 2026 Outlook
- Nucor Continues to Hold CSP Steel Price for 4th Week: Steel Market Analysis for January 2026
- Hyundai and Boston Dynamics Unveil All‑Electric Atlas Robot: Transforming the Future of Steel Production, Distribution, and Auto Manufacturing
- Nucor Continues to Hold Steel Price at $950/Ton: What Q1 2026 Holds for Steel Prices, Tariffs, and Market Recovery
📬 Enjoying this article? Do not miss the next one.
Subscribe below to the Steel Industry News email newsletter to get the latest updates delivered straight to your inbox, including comprehensive reporting on the steel industry, plus the latest podcast, video, ebooks, and industry insights, so you receive the most recent steel news reports in one easy-to-read format
Your all-access pass to steel industry insight – now 50% off – Get The Steel Industry Newsletter’s best annual package for only $300/year – that’s a $300 savings off the regular $600 annual price. You’ll enjoy six months free compared to the monthly plan.
🔗 🔐 Upgrade to annual and save 50%
