Trump Announces New 50% Steel and Aluminum Tariffs

The 50% Tariff Shock: A New Era for U.S. Trade Policy

President Trump announces to double tariffs on steel imports from 25% to 50%—with similar hikes for aluminum effective June 4th 2025. This policy, justified by national security concerns, is designed to bolster domestic steel and aluminum producers but brings significant consequences for the entire supply chain, from mills to end consumers. The impacts will be profound and immediate, especially for industries deeply reliant on these metals.

Key Takeaways From The US Steel / Nippon Partnership Announcement

✅ No Layoffs Across U.S. Steel Facilities:
Despite the uncertainty that often accompanies sweeping tariff changes, U.S. Steel has committed to maintaining its current workforce. This provides much-needed job security for thousands of steelworkers and their families.

💵 $5,000 Bonuses for Every U.S. Steel Worker:
As a direct benefit to employees, every U.S. Steel worker will receive a $5,000 bonus. This not only rewards loyalty and hard work but also injects additional spending power into local economies.

🏭 All Facilities Will Remain Open and Operational:
U.S. Steel has pledged that none of its facilities will close as a result of these policy changes. Keeping all plants open ensures ongoing production capacity and stability in steel supply.

🔥 Blast Furnaces to Run at Full Capacity for at Least 10 Years:
A bold commitment to operate all blast furnaces at full capacity for the next decade signals confidence in the future of American steelmaking and secures long-term jobs and output.

🏗️ $4 Billion Investment from Nippon Steel in a New U.S. Mill:
Japan’s Nippon Steel will invest $4 billion in building a new, state-of-the-art steel mill in the United States. This partnership brings advanced technology, increased capacity, and new opportunities for American workers.

👷‍♂️ 70,000+ Jobs to Be Created:
The combined effect of new investments, full-capacity operations, and facility expansions has potential to create over 70,000 jobs, not just in steel but across related industries and supply chains.

💰 $14 Billion Expected to Be Injected into the U.S. Economy Over the Next 14 Months:
The economic ripple effect of these measures—including bonuses, new jobs, and capital investments—is projected to inject $14 billion into the U.S. economy in just over a year, supporting growth and prosperity in manufacturing regions.

Potential Effects on U.S. Steel and Aluminum Mills

Domestic steel and aluminum mills are the primary intended beneficiaries of the new 50% tariffs. The logic is straightforward: by making imported metals dramatically more expensive, U.S. producers gain a competitive edge, potentially leading to:

Increased Market Share: Domestic mills may see a surge in orders as importers are priced out of the market.
Higher Profit Margins: With less competition, mills can raise prices, improving profitability.
Potential for Reinvestment: Higher revenues could enable investments in modernization and capacity expansion.

However, the benefits are not without caveats:

Supply Constraints: The U.S. does not produce enough steel and aluminum to meet total domestic demand, especially for specialized grades4. Mills may become overwhelmed, leading to shortages and delivery delays.
Volatility and Uncertainty: The abruptness and scale of the tariff hike inject volatility into the market, making long-term planning difficult for mills and their customers.
Downstream Backlash: If higher prices lead to reduced demand from key sectors like automotive and construction, mills could face a boom-bust cycle.

Quote:

“U.S. manufacturers at a significant disadvantage, including those who do not import these raw materials. The U.S. does not generate sufficient steel or aluminum to fulfill domestic needs, and establishing new production facilities is not an immediate solution.”
— Coalition of American Metal Manufacturers and Users4

Automotive Industry: Rising Costs, Supply Chain Disruption, and Consumer Fallout

The automotive sector is especially vulnerable to the new 50% tariffs. Cars and trucks are among the largest consumers of steel and aluminum, and the industry’s highly integrated global supply chains mean that cost increases ripple rapidly through the system.

Key Potential Impacts:

Production Cost Surge: The cost of steel and aluminum is a major component of vehicle manufacturing. A 50% tariff could add thousands of dollars to the cost of building a vehicle, with estimates ranging from $4,000 to $6,400 per car, depending on the model and import content.
Supply Chain Disruption: Automakers rely on parts and materials that cross borders multiple times. Tariffs disrupt these flows, causing delays, shortages, and increased logistics costs.
Profitability Squeeze: Major automakers like Ford and Honda have already reported millions in extra costs from previous tariffs. With the new 50% rate, Tier 1 and Tier 2 suppliers—often operating on thin margins—face existential threats.
Job Losses: The Center for Automotive Research estimates a 2-million unit reduction in vehicles sold and up to 700,000 job losses if tariffs are fully passed through the supply chain.
Higher Car Prices for Consumers: Most automakers will pass on increased costs to buyers, raising new car prices and monthly payments. This could push many consumers out of the new car market, boosting demand for used vehicles and shared mobility options.

Table: Projected Impact of 50% Tariffs on Automotive Sector

Impact Area	Previous Tariff (25%)	New Tariff (50%)	Potential Effect
Average Car Price Increase	$3,200–$4,000	$6,400+	Higher monthly payments
Estimated Job Losses	350,000+	700,000+	Plant closures, layoffs
Vehicle Sales Reduction	1 million units	2 million units	Lower production volume

Construction Industry: Escalating Project Costs and Delays

The construction industry—from residential homebuilding to large-scale infrastructure—relies heavily on steel and aluminum for beams, frames, rebar, and more. The new tariffs will have immediate and far-reaching effects:

Material Cost Increases: Steel and aluminum account for a large portion of construction budgets. A 50% tariff will drive up the cost of everything from skyscrapers to bridges and homes, making many projects financially unviable for developers and public agencies 4.
Project Delays and Cancellations: Higher costs and uncertainty may force delays or cancellations of planned projects, especially those with tight budgets or fixed public funding.
Reduced Demand: As construction becomes more expensive, demand for new projects could fall, impacting employment and economic growth in the sector.

Fact:

Construction industry groups warn that the U.S. does not have enough domestic production to meet demand, and the time required to build new mills or expand capacity means shortages and price spikes are likely in the near term 4.

Consumers: Higher Prices Across the Board

Consumers may feel the effects of the new tariffs in multiple ways:

More Expensive Goods: From cars and appliances to electronics and furniture, any product containing steel or aluminum is likely to become more expensive as manufacturers pass on higher input costs 4.
Inflationary Pressure: The broad-based price increases could contribute to overall inflation, eroding purchasing power.
Limited Choices: If automakers and construction firms cut production, consumers may face fewer choices and longer wait times for big-ticket items.

Exclusions and Negotiations: Little Relief in Sight

Unlike previous tariff rounds, the new 50% tariffs come with far fewer exclusions and limited scope for negotiation:

Country and Product Exemptions: Most previous exemptions for countries like Canada, Mexico, and Australia have been revoked or suspended. Only a temporary suspension for Ukraine remains, set to expire soon 4.
Product-Specific Exclusions: Previously granted product exclusions remain only until their expiration or quota is filled. No new exclusions are being granted, and the Commerce Department’s authority to approve them has been withdrawn4.
Negotiation Window: There is a brief window before all measures take effect, but industry analysts see little appetite from the administration for broad-based relief or new carve-outs 4.

Quote:

“The primary options are to source materials domestically or incur higher costs for imports. In either scenario, expenses are set to rise.”
— Jacob Kocheser, Boston Consulting Group4

Existing Exclusions: What Changes Under the New 50% Tariffs?

The introduction of the new 50% tariffs on steel and aluminum marks a sweeping overhaul of the previous system of exclusions and exemptions. For years, importers and manufacturers could apply for country-specific or product-specific exclusions to avoid tariffs on materials not available domestically or critical to U.S. industries. However, the latest proclamations and regulatory changes fundamentally alter this landscape.

Elimination of the Exclusions Process

No New Exclusions: As of February 10, 2025, the Department of Commerce stopped accepting new applications for product exclusions from Section 232 steel and aluminum tariffs. This is a direct result of the “Inclusion Proclamations,” which aim to close perceived loopholes and extend the reach of tariffs to derivative products as well 1 4.
Existing Exclusions Winding Down: Exclusions that had already been granted before February 10, 2025, remain valid only until their stated expiration date or until the approved import volume is exhausted—whichever comes first. No renewals or extensions are permitted under the new rules4.
Revocation of General Approved Exclusions (GAEs): All GAEs, which previously allowed broad categories of products or countries to be exempted, are revoked as of March 12, 2025. This includes alternative arrangements such as absolute quotas, tariff-rate quotas, and country-level exemptions for major trading partners like Canada, Mexico, the EU, and others4 5 6.
Derivative Products Now Covered: The new rules also expand tariffs to a wide array of derivative steel and aluminum products, including manufactured goods such as fasteners, household items, construction materials, and many industrial components. These products were previously outside the tariff scope or covered by exclusions, but are now squarely within it1 2 6.

Country-Specific Exemptions: Now Mostly Gone

Country Exemptions Revoked: Exemptions for countries such as Canada, Mexico, Australia, the EU, the UK, Japan, and South Korea have been eliminated. Imports from these countries are now subject to the full 50% tariff unless a future bilateral agreement is negotiated 3 4 6.
Temporary Exception: The only notable exception is a temporary suspension for Ukraine, which is set to expire soon unless further extended 4.
Special Cases: For certain derivative steel products from Turkey, a 50% tariff applies, while primary Turkish steel remains at 25% 2.

What Remains for Existing Exclusions?

Expiration or Volume Cap: If you already had an exclusion, it will remain valid only until its expiration date or until you hit the import volume limit. After that, the 50% tariff applies with no recourse for renewal4 5.
No New Applications: There is no avenue to apply for new exclusions under the current rules1 4 6.
No Duty Drawback: Importers cannot claim a duty drawback (refund) for these tariffs, even if goods are re-exported6.

New “Inclusions” Process

Expanding the Scope: Instead of exclusions, the Department of Commerce has launched an “inclusions” process, allowing U.S. manufacturers and trade associations to request that new derivative articles be added to the tariff list. This is intended to prevent circumvention and further broaden the reach of tariffs, not to provide relief1.
Public Comment and Review: Inclusion requests are reviewed in defined periods, with public comment and a 60-day decision window. This process is about expanding, not reducing, tariff coverage1.

Practical Implications

Importers and manufacturers must now assume that nearly all steel and aluminum products—including many finished and derivative goods—will be subject to the new 50% tariffs.
Any business relying on previous exclusions should immediately review expiration dates and prepare for a significant cost increase once those exclusions lapse.
There is a very limited window before all modifications take effect, but there is no formal process for negotiating new exclusions at this time3 5.

Quote:

“Today’s rule also eliminates the Section 232 aluminum and steel exclusions process. In accordance with the Inclusion Proclamations, no new applications for product exclusions have been accepted after February 10, 2025.”
— U.S. Department of Commerce1

European Union: Strong Condemnation and Threat of Retaliation

The European Commission has been the most vocal in its criticism, stating it “strongly regrets” the U.S. decision to double tariffs and warning that the move undermines ongoing efforts to reach a negotiated agreement. EU officials emphasized that this tariff hike “introduces additional uncertainty into the global economy and raises expenses for consumers and businesses on both sides of the Atlantic”1 2. The EU had previously suspended its own countermeasures to allow room for dialogue, but now signals it is ready to respond forcefully.

“The EU stands ready to implement countermeasures, including those in response to the recent U.S. tariff increase a European Commission spokesperson confirmed, adding that the Commission is finalizing consultations on expanded countermeasures.

Unless a mutually acceptable resolution is reached, both current and new EU measures will automatically come into effect on July 14—or sooner, if circumstances require1. These countermeasures are expected to target a range of U.S. goods, mirroring the EU’s response to similar tariffs imposed during the first Trump administration.

Other Major Trading Partners: Retaliation, Exemptions, and Negotiations

Canada, Mexico, Brazil, Japan, South Korea, and the UK: These countries, among the top suppliers of steel and aluminum to the U.S., have also been affected by the elimination of previous exemptions and are evaluating their responses. Some are expected to impose reciprocal tariffs or seek new negotiations for relief.
China: Historically, China has responded to U.S. steel and aluminum tariffs with its own set of retaliatory duties on U.S. exports, and similar measures are anticipated now.
India and Others: Some countries, like India, are reportedly seeking to negotiate exemptions or adjust their trade policies to mitigate the impact, while also preparing their own countermeasures if necessary.

World Trade Organization (WTO): Legal Challenges Expected

The new tariffs are likely to face renewed legal challenges at the WTO, as was the case with the 2018 tariffs. However, with the WTO’s dispute resolution system currently hamstrung, enforcement of any rulings remains uncertain 8.

Summary Table: International Responses

Region/Country	Response to Tariffs	Countermeasures/Actions
European Union	Strong condemnation, readiness to retaliate	Countermeasures to take effect by July 14 unless resolved 1
Canada, Mexico, Brazil, Japan, S. Korea, UK	Reviewing options, possible reciprocal tariffs, seeking negotiations	Likely to impose or expand retaliatory tariffs 7
China	Retaliatory tariffs on U.S. goods expected	Legal challenge at WTO, counter-tariffs 4
India, Others	Seeking exemptions, possible negotiations	Adjusting trade policy, potential countermeasures 4

Legal Status of the New 50% Steel and Aluminum Tariffs: Not Yet Law and Subject to Challenge

While President Trump has publicly announced his intention to double steel tariffs to 50%, it is important to understand that these new tariffs are not yet fully in effect as law. The announcement represents a policy direction and intent, but the formal implementation requires administrative action and may face legal hurdles before becoming fully enforceable.

Pending Legal Challenges and Court Decisions

Recent weeks have seen significant judicial scrutiny of Trump’s trade policies. Notably, a federal court ruled that several of Trump’s tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) were illegal, citing that the president exceeded his authority in imposing sweeping tariffs on imports from countries including China, Canada, and Mexico. Although this ruling temporarily halted those specific tariffs, the administration successfully obtained a stay, keeping them in place for now while appeals proceed.

However, the steel and aluminum tariffs announced under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, which are based on national security grounds, have so far not been invalidated by the courts and remain in effect. This distinction is crucial because Section 232 provides a different legal foundation than IEEPA, and courts have generally given the executive branch broader discretion under Section 232.

Still, the legal landscape remains unsettled. Multiple lawsuits from states, businesses, and trade groups challenge the tariffs’ legality, arguing that the president overstepped his authority or that the tariffs violate trade agreements. For example, a coalition of small businesses and states has successfully won early court victories, although appeals and stays mean these cases will take time to resolve.

Potential for Further Legal Battles

Because the new 50% tariffs represent a significant escalation, it is highly likely that affected parties—including foreign governments, U.S. importers, and downstream industries—will mount legal challenges. Courts may be asked to review whether the administration has properly justified the tariffs under national security grounds and followed required procedures.

Additionally, legal experts note that the administration has other trade tools at its disposal, such as Sections 301 and 122 of the Trade Act, which could be used to impose tariffs through alternative legal pathways if Section 232 authority is constrained by courts.

This evolving legal environment means that while the tariffs signal a strong policy stance, their ultimate fate will depend on judicial rulings and administrative actions in the coming months. Businesses, consumers, and trading partners should stay alert to further developments as the situation unfolds.

Potential Supreme Court Challenge to Trump’s New Tariffs

The legality of President Trump’s newly announced tariffs—including the 50% steel tariffs and the increased aluminum tariffs—faces a highly uncertain future, with legal experts widely predicting that the issue is headed for the Supreme Court. This is due to a recent ruling by the New York-based Court of International Trade, which struck down many of Trump’s tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), arguing that the administration overstepped its authority and encroached on Congress’s constitutional power to regulate tariffs.

Why the Supreme Court May Take the Case

Historically, the Supreme Court has rarely intervened in trade disputes, with its last significant ruling on the subject occurring in 2009 (U.S. v. Eurodif S.A.). However, the current legal battle is different because it raises fundamental questions about the separation of powers and the limits of presidential authority over trade. The Court of International Trade’s decision challenges the Trump administration’s use of IEEPA to impose sweeping tariffs, stating that such broad action effectively usurps Congress’s constitutional role.

According to Lee Smith, an international trade law expert at Baker Donelson, the Trump administration chose IEEPA as a legal tool to expedite the tariff process, bypassing the slower mechanisms found in other trade statutes. Now, with the Court of International Trade ruling against the administration, both sides are preparing for a protracted legal fight. If the administration loses its appeal, it has already signaled its intent to bring the case before the Supreme Court.

“It’s a constitutional question… The Trump administration is taking it up no matter what, if they lose. The other side has already won—the Court of International Trade. So, if they lose the Court of Appeals, they’re going to want the Supreme Court to reinstate the earlier decision.”
— Lee Smith, Baker Donelson (via Fortune)

New Supreme Court Precedents May Shape the Outcome

The legal landscape has shifted dramatically since Trump’s first round of tariff battles. Two recent Supreme Court decisions—West Virginia v. EPA and Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo—have overturned the Chevron Doctrine, a longstanding principle that required courts to defer to federal agencies’ interpretations of ambiguous statutes. Now, courts have more power to independently interpret the meaning of terms like “national security” or “retaliation,” which are central to the administration’s tariff justifications.

Stavros Gadinis, a law professor at U.C. Berkeley, notes that these decisions mean presidents must provide stronger evidence and clearer statutory support for their actions. The courts no longer automatically defer to the executive branch’s definitions, making it more challenging for the administration to defend broad or novel uses of trade law.

“Thanks to the overturning of the Chevron doctrine, the courts don’t need to automatically defer to the administration’s definition of ambiguous terms used by Trump to back his tariffs such as ‘national security’ or ‘retaliation.’ Instead these definitions will be decided by the court, which may or may not agree with the administration’s definition.”
— Stavros Gadinis, U.C. Berkeley (via Fortune)

Procedural Hurdles and the Odds of Success

During Trump’s first term, the administration was largely successful in defending tariffs that followed established procedures, such as the investigation into China’s intellectual property practices. However, legal experts point out that the most recent tariffs lack the same procedural rigor, making them more vulnerable to legal challenge. Courts may view the new tariffs as broader and less justified than previous measures, increasing the likelihood they could be struck down.

While the Supreme Court’s current conservative majority has shown deference to presidential authority in the past, the recent shift in legal doctrine means the outcome is far from certain. The Court’s willingness to check executive power—especially when Congress’s constitutional role is at stake—will be tested in what could become a landmark case for the balance of power in U.S. trade policy.

Conclusion: Navigating a New Era of High Tariffs

The doubling of steel and aluminum tariffs to 50% marks a turning point in U.S. trade policy. While the move is designed to protect domestic mills, the broader economic impact will be felt by automakers, construction firms, and consumers alike. With few exclusions and a limited window for negotiation, industries must brace for higher costs, supply chain disruptions, and potential job losses. The coming months will reveal whether the intended benefits for U.S. producers outweigh the widespread challenges for the rest of the economy.

Check out some of our other articles:

📬 Enjoying this article? Don’t miss the next one.
Subscribe to the Steel Industry News email newsletter to get the latest updates delivered straight to your inbox — from mill pricing to market shifts.

🆓 Stay informed with a free subscription, or
🔐 Unlock even more with a paid plan (just $10.50/month with annual billing (a 30% Discount from our Monthly plan) and get:

✅ Full access to all in-depth newsletters and podcasts
📊 U.S. mill pricing, input costs, and production data
🌍 The latest Steel Industry News direct to you
📚 Exclusive subscriber-only E-Books, reports, guides & archives
🙌 Unlock Full Access to the Steel Market Insights & Strategy Guide