Key Takeaways
- ✅ Major Investment Commitment: Nippon Steel pledged approximately $11 billion in new investments into US Steel’s American operations by 2028, targeting facility upgrades and new projects to enhance competitiveness.
- ✅ Government Oversight via Golden Share: The U.S. government secured veto power over significant corporate decisions—including plant closures, headquarters relocation, and workforce changes—through the “golden share” mechanism as part of the acquisition.
- ✅ Preservation of US Steel’s American Identity: US Steel maintains its Pittsburgh headquarters and American management, with board oversight incorporating U.S. government appointees to ensure continued alignment with national interests.
- ✅ A New Model for Foreign Investment: This merger represents a novel approach balancing foreign capital access with domestic governance safeguards, setting a precedent for future cross-border investments in strategic industries.
The relationship between US Steel and policies under the Trump administration includes a unique example of government involvement in the corporate sector. In September 2025, President Donald Trump exercised an authority often referred to as a “golden share” to prevent US Steel from closing its Granite City steel plant in Illinois. This authority, established as part of the $14.9 billion acquisition of US Steel by Japan’s Nippon Steel, allows federal oversight on certain corporate decisions. This case highlights how government agreements and regulatory conditions can influence the operations of major industrial companies in the U.S. steel sector.
The Genesis of America’s Steel Giant
United States Steel Corporation stands as one of America’s most enduring industrial giants, with roots stretching back to the dawn of the 20th century. Founded in 1901 through the merger of Andrew Carnegie’s Carnegie Steel Company with Federal Steel Company and other steelmakers, US Steel was capitalized at an unprecedented $1.4 billion, making it the world’s first billion-dollar corporation. The company emerged from the vision of business titans including Andrew Carnegie, J.P. Morgan, and Charles Schwab, under the leadership of chairman Elbert H. Gary.
During its early decades, US Steel dominated the American steel landscape, producing roughly two-thirds of the nation’s steel output in 1901. The company operated not merely as a steel producer but as an industrial empire, controlling mines, transportation networks, and finishing facilities across the United States. However, by 2001, exactly a century after its founding, US Steel’s share of American steel production had declined dramatically to just eight percent, reflecting both increased competition and the company’s strategic challenges in adapting to global market dynamics.
The transformation of US Steel from industrial titan to modern competitor illustrates broader changes in American manufacturing. Where once the company employed hundreds of thousands of workers across dozens of facilities, today’s US Steel operates as a significantly leaner organization focused on efficiency and technological advancement. This evolution reflects not just company-specific changes but the entire American steel industry’s adaptation to global competition, environmental regulations, and changing market demands.
US Steel Financial Performance and Key Metrics
| Metric | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| Q1 2025 Net Sales | $3.73 billion | -10.4% vs Q1 2024 |
| Q1 2025 Net Income | -$116 million | vs +$171 million Q1 2024 |
| Q1 2025 Adjusted EBITDA | $172 million | Decline from previous periods |
| Total Employees (2024) | 22,053 | +1.15% vs 2023 |
| Market Share | 12% of US production | Down from 67% in 1901 |
| Stock Performance (2025) | +50% surge | Driven by acquisition optimism |
US Steel Financial Performance and Key Metrics
Current Financial Performance and Market Challenges
US Steel’s recent financial performance reflects the challenging environment facing the American steel industry. The company’s financial metrics demonstrate both the volatility inherent in steel markets and the ongoing pressures from global competition. Net sales of $3.73 billion in the first quarter of 2025 represented a 10.4% decline compared to the previous year, while the company posted a net loss of $116 million, a dramatic reversal from the $171 million profit in the same period of 2024.
These financial headwinds underscore why US Steel sought the partnership with Nippon Steel, viewing the acquisition as essential for long-term competitiveness and survival. The company’s adjusted EBITDA of $172 million, while positive, reflects margins under pressure from both raw material costs and competitive pricing dynamics. However, US Steel’s stock performance tells a different story, with shares surging over 50% during 2025, largely driven by optimism surrounding the Nippon Steel acquisition and potential benefits from increased trade protection.
The disconnect between operational financial performance and stock market valuation highlights the complex factors influencing US Steel’s market position. Investors are weighing the company’s fundamental challenges against the potential benefits of foreign capital infusion and government protection through trade policies. This dynamic creates both opportunities and risks as the company navigates its new ownership structure under unprecedented government oversight.
The company’s employment levels provide another perspective on its current position. With approximately 22,053 workers as of December 2024, US Steel achieved a modest 1.15% increase in employment, bucking broader industry trends toward workforce reduction. This employment growth, while small, suggests some stability in operations despite financial challenges and reflects management’s commitment to maintaining production capabilities.
Operational Infrastructure and Production Capabilities
US Steel maintains an extensive operational infrastructure designed to serve diverse market segments across the United States. The company’s production capabilities span from raw material processing to finished steel products, providing vertical integration advantages that remain crucial for competitive positioning in global markets.
US Steel Major Facilities and Production Capabilities
| Facility | Location | Type | Capacity | Key Features |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gary Works | Indiana | Integrated Steel Mill | 7.5 million net tons | Blast furnaces, BOF, finishing |
| Mon Valley Works | Pennsylvania | Integrated Operations | 2.9 million net tons | Edgar Thomson, Irvin, Clairton Plants |
| Big River Steel | Arkansas | Electric Arc Furnace | 3.3 million tons | EAF, continuous galvanizing |
| Granite City Works | Illinois | Integrated Mill | 2.5 million tons | Subject to recent closure dispute |
| Keetac/Minntac | Minnesota | Iron Ore Operations | 22+ million tons pellets | Mesabi Range taconite processing |
US Steel Major Facilities and Production Capabilities
The Gary Works in Indiana stands as US Steel’s flagship integrated steel mill, featuring comprehensive production facilities including blast furnaces, basic oxygen furnaces, and extensive finishing capabilities. With an annual capacity of 7.5 million net tons, Gary Works represents one of the largest integrated steel operations in North America. The facility’s strategic location near Lake Michigan provides access to iron ore shipments from Minnesota while serving key automotive and manufacturing markets throughout the Midwest.
US Steel’s Mon Valley Works in Pennsylvania represents the company’s historical heartland, encompassing four separate facilities with combined annual capacity of 2.9 million net tons. The Edgar Thomson Plant in Braddock continues basic steel production operations that have operated for over a century, while the Irvin Plant in West Mifflin specializes in sheet product rolling. These integrated facilities provide US Steel with vertical integration advantages, controlling the steelmaking process from raw materials through finished products.
The Big River Steel facility in Arkansas exemplifies US Steel’s commitment to modern technology, featuring state-of-the-art electric arc furnace technology with annual capacity of approximately 3.3 million tons. This facility achieved record quarterly shipments in 2025, demonstrating the potential for technological improvements to drive performance even in challenging market conditions. The plant’s advanced continuous galvanizing capabilities enable production of high-value coated products for automotive applications.
US Steel’s Minnesota Ore Operations demonstrate the company’s commitment to controlling its supply chain through upstream integration. The Keetac and Minntac facilities on the Mesabi Iron Range process iron-bearing taconite rock into iron ore pellets, with combined annual production capability exceeding 22 million net tons. This supply security provides cost advantages and operational flexibility, particularly important given global supply chain uncertainties and trade tensions affecting raw material markets.
The Nippon Steel Partnership and “Golden Share” Authority
The $14.9 billion acquisition of US Steel by Japan’s Nippon Steel Corporation represents a significant development in American industrial policy and corporate governance. Instead of simply approving or blocking the foreign acquisition, the Trump administration established an arrangement that allowed the investment to proceed while incorporating government oversight through a “golden share” mechanism. This arrangement aims to balance the need for global capital investment with the protection of domestic strategic interests by providing the U.S. government certain veto rights over key corporate decisions.
Key Timeline: Trump Administration and US Steel Relationship
| Date | Event | Significance |
|---|---|---|
| March 2018 | Trump imposes 25% steel tariffs | Initial protection for US steel industry |
| December 2023 | Nippon Steel announces US Steel bid | $14.9 billion acquisition proposal |
| February 2025 | Trump restores Section 232 tariffs | Reinforces steel protection policy |
| June 2025 | Trump doubles steel tariffs to 50% | Escalates trade protection measures |
| June 2025 | Nippon-US Steel deal closes | Acquisition completes with “golden share” |
| August 2025 | “golden share” authority established | Government veto power over operations |
| September 2025 | Granite City plant closure blocked | First use of “golden share” authority |
Key Timeline: Trump Administration and US Steel Relationship
Under the “golden share” arrangement, the U.S. government retains veto power over critical corporate decisions, including plant closures, major production shifts, workforce reductions, and strategic asset disposals. This authority was dramatically demonstrated in September 2025 when Trump officials blocked US Steel from proceeding with the indefinite idling of its Granite City Works in Illinois. The intervention marked the first practical application of the “golden share” mechanism and established a precedent for direct government involvement in corporate operational decisions.
The “golden share” concept, borrowed from European privatization models but adapted for American strategic purposes, grants extraordinary veto powers over critical corporate decisions. This mechanism represents a fundamental departure from traditional American capitalism, where government intervention in private enterprise has historically been limited to regulatory oversight rather than direct operational control. The arrangement creates a hybrid ownership structure where foreign capital provides financial strength while American government oversight ensures strategic control.
Nippon Steel’s acquisition brings significant financial resources and technological capabilities to US Steel, with commitments to invest up to $2.7 billion in American operations and maintain domestic production levels. The Japanese company has pledged to honor existing labor agreements, maintain US Steel’s Pittsburgh headquarters, and preserve the company’s American identity while providing access to Nippon Steel’s advanced technologies and global market reach.
The partnership structure may serve as a template for future foreign investments in sectors deemed critical to national security or economic sovereignty. This model acknowledges the reality that American steel companies often lack the financial resources to compete effectively against state-supported foreign competitors while maintaining domestic control over strategic decision-making processes.
Economic Impact and Regional Significance
The American iron and steel industry, including US Steel, generates substantial economic impact extending far beyond direct employment figures. According to industry analysis, the sector accounts for more than $520 billion in economic output and nearly two million jobs when considering direct, indirect, and induced impacts. These workers earned over $130 billion in wages and benefits, while the industry generated $56 billion in federal, state, and local taxes.
US Steel’s workforce of over 22,000 employees represents a significant portion of this economic impact, supporting not only direct employment but also extensive supplier networks and community economic activity. The company’s operations create ripple effects throughout regional economies, particularly in traditional steel-producing areas like Pittsburgh, Gary, and the broader Rust Belt region.
The regional economic impact of US Steel operations extends far beyond direct employment statistics. Communities hosting major steel facilities depend heavily on the economic activity generated by these operations, from local suppliers and service providers to retail establishments and housing markets. Plant closures or significant production reductions can devastate local economies, explaining the political sensitivity surrounding decisions like the Granite City Works situation that triggered the first use of “golden share” authority.
However, the steel industry continues facing long-term employment challenges despite recent modest growth. Manufacturing job losses linked to trade policies and global competition have affected steel-producing regions significantly. Analysis suggests that while steel tariffs may protect some jobs within the steel industry, they can lead to job losses in downstream manufacturing sectors that rely on steel as an input material, creating complex economic trade-offs.
Recent studies indicate that manufacturing employment has declined by approximately 33,000 jobs in 2025, with some analysts attributing these losses to higher input costs resulting from steel tariffs. This dynamic illustrates the complexity of trade policy impacts, where protection for one industry can create challenges for others within the broader manufacturing ecosystem.
Technological Innovation and Modernization Efforts
US Steel continues investing in technological advancement despite financial challenges, recognizing that operational efficiency and product innovation remain crucial for long-term competitiveness. The company’s Research and Technology Center in Munhall, Pennsylvania, represents a world-class facility where scientists and industry experts collaborate on advanced steelmaking solutions. This LEED-certified facility houses sophisticated laboratories, materials testing capabilities, and development facilities that simulate all aspects of steel production.
The Big River Steel facility exemplifies US Steel’s commitment to modern technology, featuring state-of-the-art electric arc furnace technology and advanced finishing capabilities. This facility’s record quarterly shipments in 2025 demonstrate the potential for technological improvements to drive performance improvements even in challenging market conditions. The plant’s continuous galvanizing capabilities enable production of high-strength, lightweight steel products increasingly demanded by automotive manufacturers.
Environmental sustainability represents another area of technological focus for US Steel, as the company works to reduce carbon emissions and improve energy efficiency across its operations. The steel industry faces increasing pressure to address environmental impacts, with carbon reduction becoming both a regulatory requirement and a competitive necessity as customers prioritize sustainability in their supply chains.
Looking forward, US Steel faces both opportunities and challenges in adapting to evolving market demands. The automotive industry’s transition toward lightweight, high-strength steel products creates opportunities for value-added production, while infrastructure spending and domestic manufacturing initiatives could provide sustained demand support. However, these opportunities require continued investment in advanced production technologies and product development capabilities.
The partnership with Nippon Steel potentially accelerates technological advancement by providing access to Japanese expertise in steelmaking efficiency and product development. Nippon Steel’s global experience with advanced steel grades and production techniques could enhance US Steel’s competitive capabilities, though the success of this technology transfer depends on effective integration while maintaining the operational control mechanisms established through the “golden share” arrangement.
Highlights of the Nippon Steel – US Steel Merger
The merger between Japan’s Nippon Steel Corporation and United States Steel Corporation, finalized in June 2025 for approximately $14.9 billion, represents a significant development in the global steel industry and U.S. manufacturing landscape. Key aspects of the deal include:
- Investment Commitments: Nippon Steel has pledged approximately $11 billion in new investments in US Steel operations by 2028. This includes upgrading existing facilities and funding new steel production projects, aimed at modernizing US Steel’s capacity and enhancing competitiveness.
- Corporate Governance and U.S. Oversight: As part of a National Security Agreement (NSA) with the U.S. government, a “golden share” was issued, granting the U.S. government veto powers over major decisions. This includes the ability to block changes to US Steel’s headquarters location, name, production shifts outside the country, plant closures, and significant workforce reductions.
- Headquarters and Identity: US Steel remains a U.S.-incorporated entity headquartered in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, ensuring that the company’s historical and operational roots in the United States are preserved.
- Board Composition and Leadership: The company’s board will include U.S. government oversight, with certain board members appointed by the U.S. president. Leadership remains under an American CEO with a board majority comprising U.S. citizens, reaffirming the company’s American management structure.
- Regulatory and Political Process: The merger process involved extensive regulatory review, including initial opposition from the Biden administration on national security grounds, followed by approval from President Trump upon the establishment of the NSA and accompanying safeguards.
- Industry Impact: The combined entity forms one of the world’s largest steel producers, with access to Nippon Steel’s advanced technology and resources. The partnership is expected to drive innovation, capacity improvements, and sustain thousands of American jobs in the steel sector.
This merger highlights a novel model for cross-border industrial investments balancing economic considerations with national security and labor protections, and its success will be widely watched by policymakers and industry stakeholders alike.
Strategic Implications and Future Outlook
US Steel’s current position reflects broader themes in American industrial policy and the ongoing challenge of maintaining competitive manufacturing capabilities in a global economy. The company’s partnership with Nippon Steel under government oversight represents an innovative attempt to access foreign capital and expertise while maintaining domestic control over strategic assets.
The “golden share” mechanism creates both opportunities and constraints for US Steel’s future development. While government oversight provides protection against decisions that might harm American interests or local communities, it also introduces political considerations into corporate decision-making processes.
The company’s success in navigating this new operating environment will likely influence how other foreign investments in strategic American industries like steel are structured. US Steel has become a test case for balancing foreign investment benefits with national security considerations, making its performance crucial for broader policy development and industrial strategy.
Key factors that will determine US Steel’s future success include effective integration of Nippon Steel’s technologies and expertise, maintaining operational efficiency while satisfying government oversight requirements, adapting to evolving market demands for advanced steel products, and managing the complex stakeholder relationships created by the “golden share” arrangement.
SOURCES
CNBC – “Trump wields ‘golden share’ to halt U.S. Steel plant shutdown, WSJ reports” (September 20, 2025)
https://www.cnbc.com/2025/09/20/trump-golden-share-us-steel.html
Fortune – “Trump is already wielding his ‘golden share’ authority at U.S. Steel, overriding the company plans” (September 19, 2025)
https://fortune.com/2025/09/20/trump-us-steel-nippon-trump-golden-share-granite-city-plant-blocked-politics/
Reuters – “Trump invokes ‘golden share’ to block U.S. Steel plans for Illinois plant, WSJ reports” (September 19, 2025)
https://www.reuters.com/business/trump-invokes-golden-share-block-us-steel-plans-illinois-plant-wsj-reports-2025-09-19/
Yahoo Finance – “Trump officials blocked US Steel from stopping work at plant” (September 19, 2025)
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/trump-officials-blocked-us-steel-000740586.html
NBC News – “Trump ratchets up steel tariffs to 50%” (June 4, 2025)
https://www.nbcnews.com/business/business-news/trump-raises-tariffs-steel-50-percent-what-to-know-rcna210375
National Law Review – “Trump Tariffs Reshape U.S. Steel Deal Landscape” (June 19, 2025)
https://natlawreview.com/article/steel-wars-foreign-steel-can-dodge-us-tariffs-not-us-control-new-era-investing
Yahoo Finance – “The White House says it blocked US Steel’s decision to stop…” (September 22, 2025)
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/white-house-says-blocked-us-173637609.html
CNN – “The Trump administration just doubled the tariffs on steel and aluminum” (June 4, 2025)
https://www.cnn.com/2025/06/04/business/steel-aluminum-tariffs-doubled-trump
White House – “American Steelmakers Are Thriving Under President Trump” (July 21, 2025)
https://www.whitehouse.gov/articles/2025/07/us-steelmakers-are-thriving-under-president-trump/
CSIS – “Understanding Trump’s Decision to Approve the Nippon Steel Deal” (June 15, 2025)
https://www.csis.org/analysis/understanding-trumps-decision-approve-nippon-steel-deal
Council on Foreign Relations – “Trump’s New Aluminum and Steel Tariffs Explained in Six Charts” (February 13, 2025)
https://www.cfr.org/article/trumps-new-aluminum-and-steel-tariffs-explained-six-charts
Reuters – “Nippon Steel’s purchase of U.S. Steel closes, with big role for Trump” (June 18, 2025)
https://www.reuters.com/sustainability/boards-policy-regulation/nippon-steels-acquisition-us-steel-closes-with-big-role-trump-2025-06-18/
Post-Gazette – “Report: Trump uses ‘golden share’ to stop U.S. Steel plant closure in Illinois” (September 19, 2025)
https://www.post-gazette.com/business/powersource/2025/09/20/nippon-us-steel-trump-golden-share/stories/202509200054
Peterson Institute for International Economics – “Trump’s tariffs enrich steel barons at high cost to US manufacturers” (June 1, 2025)
https://www.piie.com/blogs/realtime-economics/2025/trumps-tariffs-enrich-steel-barons-high-cost-us-manufacturers-and
Associated Press – “The White House says it blocked US Steel’s decision to stop…” (September 22, 2025)
https://apnews.com/article/us-steel-trump-nippon-steel-granite-city-7d9acc7f1a1b08b971b374c40574beec
Engineering.com – “The Long, Strange History of U.S. Steel” (February 7, 2024)
https://www.engineering.com/the-long-strange-history-of-u-s-steel/
BBC – “Nippon and US Steel complete controversial merger” (June 18, 2025)
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cr795e229lmo
Britannica – “United States Steel Corporation | History, Acquisition, & Facts” (June 17, 2025)
https://www.britannica.com/money/United-States-Steel-Corporation
IMAA Institute – “Nippon Steel Acquires US Steel in $15B Deal | What It Means” (June 24, 2025)
https://imaa-institute.org/blog/nippon-steels-acquisition-of-us-steel/
Construction Physics – “No inventions; no innovations,” a History of US Steel” (December 28, 2023)
https://www.construction-physics.com/p/no-inventions-no-innovations-a-history
PBS NewsHour – “Nippon Steel finalizes $15 billion buyout of U.S. Steel after sealing national security agreement” (June 18, 2025)
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/economy/nippon-steel-finalizes-15-billion-buyout-of-u-s-steel-after-sealing-national-security-agreement
White House – “Fact Sheet: President Donald J. Trump Restores Section 232 Tariffs” (February 11, 2025)
https://www.whitehouse.gov/fact-sheets/2025/02/fact-sheet-president-donald-j-trump-restores-section-232-tariffs/
Harvard Business School – “The Founding of U.S. Steel and the Power of Public Opinion” (December 31, 2000)
https://www.library.hbs.edu/us-steel/exhibition/the-founding-of-u.s.-steel-and-the-power-of-public-opinion
Holland & Knight – “Nippon Steel and U. S. Steel Announce Finalized Merger Agreement” (June 19, 2025)
https://www.hklaw.com/en/insights/publications/2025/06/nippon-steel-and-us-steel-announce-finalized-merger-agreement
US Steel – “About Us – History” (December 30, 2001)
https://www.ussteel.com/about-us/history
US Steel – “Nippon Steel Corporation and U. S. Steel Finalize Historic Partnership” (June 17, 2025)
https://www.ussteel.com/newsroom/-/blogs/nippon-steel-corporation-and-u-s-steel-finalize-historic-partnership
Economic Policy Institute – “Trump proclamation resets steel and aluminum tariffs” (June 16, 2025)
https://www.epi.org/policywatch/trump-proclamation-resets-steel-and-aluminum-tariffs/
Nippon Steel – “Nippon Steel Corporation and U. S. Steel Finalize Historic Partnership” (June 17, 2025)
https://www.nipponsteel.com/en/news/20250618_100.html
Investopedia – “Golden Share: Overview, Benefits and Examples” (August 18, 2021)
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/g/goldenshare.asp
White House – “Fact Sheet: President Donald J. Trump Increases Section 232 Tariffs on Steel and Aluminum” (June 2, 2025)
https://www.whitehouse.gov/fact-sheets/2025/06/fact-sheet-president-donald-j-trump-increases-section-232-tariffs-on-steel-and-aluminum/
World Economic Forum – “Tariffs and talent scarcity: Are there enough steel workers in the US?” (July 28, 2025)
https://www.weforum.org/stories/2025/07/tariffs-talent-scarcity-steel-workers-us/
IBISWorld – “Iron & Steel Manufacturing in the US Employment Statistics” (December 31, 2024)
https://www.ibisworld.com/united-states/employment/iron-steel-manufacturing/569/
American Iron and Steel Institute – “The Economic Impact of the American Iron and Steel Industry” (October 14, 2020)
https://www.steel.org/economicimpact/
Data USA – “Iron & steel mills & steel product manufacturing” (December 31, 2022)
https://datausa.io/profile/naics/iron-steel-mills-steel-product-manufacturing
American Iron and Steel Institute – “AISI Statement on Trump America First Trade Policy” (January 20, 2025)
https://www.steel.org/2025/01/aisi-statement-on-trump-america-first-trade-policy/
Bureau of Labor Statistics – “Structural Iron and Steel Workers” (April 24, 2023)
https://www.bls.gov/oes/2023/may/oes472221.htm
Bureau of Industry and Security – “232 Steel” (August 27, 2023)
https://www.bis.doc.gov/index.php/232-steel
Federal Reserve Economic Data – “Employment for Manufacturing: Iron and Steel Mills and Ferroalloy Production” (April 23, 2025)
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/IPUEN3311W200000000
American Iron and Steel Institute – “Industry Data” (September 14, 2025)
https://www.steel.org/industry-data/
CNN – “Why the US is losing manufacturing jobs amid Trump’s shock tariffs” (July 11, 2025)
https://www.cnn.com/2025/07/11/business/jobs-trump-tariffs-manufacturing
Zippia – “Steel Worker Job Outlook And Growth In The US ” (December 27, 2024)
https://www.zippia.com/steel-worker-jobs/trends/
American Iron and Steel Institute – “AISI Releases Annual Statistical Report for 2023” (June 4, 2024)
https://www.steel.org/2024/06/aisi-releases-annual-statistical-report-for-2023/
CBS News – “The U.S. is losing thousands of manufacturing jobs, analysis finds” (September 9, 2025)
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/jobs-manufacturing-trump-tariffs-economy/
Trading Economics – “United States Steel Production” (May 27, 2015)
https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/steel-production
OPB – “Trump’s tariffs could translate into bigger job losses for Oregon’s manufacturing sector” (August 29, 2025)
https://www.opb.org/article/2025/08/30/trump-tariff-oregon-bigger-job-losses/
Wikipedia – “Iron and steel industry in the United States” (July 31, 2015)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iron_and_steel_industry_in_the_United_States
Federal Reserve Economic Data – “Capacity Utilization: Manufacturing: Durable Goods: Iron and Steel Mills” (September 15, 2025)
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/CAPUTLG3311A2S
JEC Senate – “NEW REPORT: Trump Tariffs and Uncertainty Are Weakening Job Growth” (September 21, 2025)
https://www.jec.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/press-releases?ID=E3D27680-6FD7-4007-BD30-86EA7C9DA117
Stout – “Current State of the U.S. Steel Market” (May 29, 2025)
https://www.stout.com/en/insights/article/current-state-us-steel-market
Equitable Growth – “Tariffs impact U.S. industries differently, with manufacturing the most exposed” (July 28, 2025)
https://equitablegrowth.org/tariffs-impact-u-s-industries-differently-with-manufacturing-the-most-exposed/
Yahoo Finance – “United States Steel Corporation Reports First Quarter 2025 Results” (May 1, 2025)
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/united-states-steel-corporation-reports-201700832.html
US Steel – “About Us – Locations” (February 28, 2020)
https://www.ussteel.com/about-us/locations
Breakwave Advisors – “Andrew Carnegie and the story of US Steel” (March 18, 2024)
https://www.breakwaveadvisors.com/insights/2024/3/19/andrew-carnegie-and-the-story-of-us-steel
Steel Dynamics – “Steel Dynamics Reports Second Quarter 2025 Results” (July 20, 2025)
https://ir.steeldynamics.com/steel-dynamics-reports-second-quarter-2025-results/
Wikipedia – “U.S. Steel” (September 10, 2003)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._Steel
Stock Analysis – “United States Steel (X) Number of Employees 1997-2024” (June 25, 2025)
https://stockanalysis.com/stocks/x/employees/
StockScan.io – “X – United States Steel Corp Stock Price Forecast 2025, 2026, 2030” (September 18, 2025)
https://stockscan.io/stocks/X/forecast
Just Security – “Trump Should Let Nippon Buy U.S. Steel” (February 5, 2025)
https://www.justsecurity.org/107530/trump-china-nippon-us-steel-acquisition/
ServiceSteel.org – “U.S. Steel & the Nippon Deal: Here’s What You Need to Know” (June 10, 2025)
https://www.servicesteel.org/resources/us-steel-nippon
Forbes – “Why Is U. S. Steel Stock Surging?” (May 29, 2025)
https://www.forbes.com/sites/greatspeculations/2025/05/29/why-is-u-s-steel-stock-surging/
Check out our most recent articles below:
- Dodge Momentum Index Inches Up For the 5th Consecutive Month
- Nucor Holds Steel Pricing Steady Two Months Straight
- 📘 [New Ebook] Stoicism: Ancient Philosophy Offers Modern Solutions
- Nucor Holds CSP Price Steady For Seventh Week
- U.S. Steel Imports Drop to Record Lows
📬 Enjoying this article? Do not miss the next one.
SUBSCRIBE below to the Steel Industry News email newsletter to get the latest updates delivered straight to your inbox. Includes a comprehensive reporting of all key topics impacting the steel industry. 🌍The Most Recent Steel News Reports — in one easy-to-read weekly format
🔐 Annual Plan: Just $126/year — that’s 7+ months free (a 58% discount compared to monthly)
